Measured by Spring Prompt

minimax-m3.1-flash:free: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict: Not presentable
Deck rating: 1,090
Slides: 7 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality: 86%

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read

In detail

Slide 1: 3 body text boxes set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 1: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: 2 body text boxes set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: A body text box set at 10.5 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: Text too faint against its background (contrast 2.4:1)

Slide 1Download slide imagePolished The right-hand card repeats the left column: £180k onboarding and 'setup call in week one + in-app checklists' both appear twice
Slide 2Download slide imagePolished The '9.8%' data label touches the top border of the chart frame
Slide 3Download slide imagePolished All three bars share one colour, so 'Completed' vs 'Not completed' is not emphasised and 'All Starter' does not read as the baseline
Slide 4Download slide imageAcceptable The chart heading sits too close to the first category label, crowding the top row.The 'SHARE OF 212 RESPONSES' header collides with the first category label 'Never got set up / too complex'
Slide 5Download slide imagePolished The orphaned line 'Universal £29 for everyone.' at the bottom of the side panel is unclear and has no label
Slide 6Download slide imagePolished
Slide 7Download slide imageAcceptable The expected-outcomes text in the left card switches to a serif typeface, inconsistent with the rest of the deck.'Expected six-month churn: 24.6% → 20.8%' wraps awkwardly, leaving '20.8%' alone on its own line