Benchmarks / DeckBench / Lumio

Measured by Spring Prompt

Mercury 3: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
812
Slides
7 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
86%

Why it is not presentable

  • Did not give the analysis's recommendation within the first two slides
  1. Slide 1 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 1Download slide imagePolished The decision statement is small and visually subdued relative to the audience/date line.
  2. Slide 2 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 2Download slide imagePolished
  3. Slide 3 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 3Download slide imageAcceptable Content is concentrated in the upper portion, leaving the lower half largely unused.The table and text sit in the top half, leaving the bottom half of the slide empty
  4. Slide 4 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 4Download slide imagePolished
  5. Slide 5 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 5Download slide imageAcceptable The cost callout panel is oversized for its content, with substantial empty space beneath the figure.Large awkward gap between the table and the explanatory text
  6. Slide 6 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 6Download slide imagePolished Bar labels are rounded (25%, 21%) while the text gives 24.6% and 20.8%; the precision is inconsistent
  7. Slide 7 of Mercury 3's deck
    Slide 7Download slide imagePolished