Benchmarks / DeckBench / Hearthside Coffee

1. 
   Slide 1Download slide imagePolished In the middle 'Recommended Option' card, the third line of body text ('run-rate') runs into the bottom border and spills out of the box
2. 
   Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable The two lower panels are text-heavy; long bullets slow scanning and dilute the emphasis established by the three headline metrics.Text-heavy for a board audience: three metric cards plus two bullet panels
3. 
   Slide 3Download slide imageAcceptable All chart bars use the same colour, leaving the adjusted pop-up result and proposal benchmark visually undifferentiated despite their importance to the takeaway.The key 'Pop-Up Adjusted' bar uses the same colour as every other bar, so the comparison the title makes is not visually emphasised
4. 
   Slide 4Download slide imageNeeds work The legend overlaps the first pair of bars; its black text and navy swatch lose contrast against the navy bar.The chart legend sits on top of the first pair of bars, and its labels overlap the bars, hurting legibility
5. 
   Slide 5Download slide imageAcceptable The table gives all rows equal emphasis, so the key Leeds–Sheffield comparison requires searching.The subtitle wraps to a second line ('agency cover.') that collides with the table header
6. 
   Slide 6Download slide imageAcceptable The three tall action cards leave substantial unused space beneath their text.Title is a topic label rather than a takeaway