Kimi K3.1 Pro: Responsive repairs: in-house team or renewed contract

For the board of trustees of a housing association, including two tenant board members. The decision it supports: whether to approve £1.2m to set up an in-house repairs team or renew the contract.

Verdict: Not presentable
Deck rating: 1,247
Slides: 5 (brief: 6-9)
Design quality: 70%

Why it is not presentable

Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
Left out a key finding
Drew a conclusion from a figure without its caveat

In detail

Caveat missing: reported repairs from October are inflated by about 12% by the new system's counting.
5 slides; the brief allows 6-9.
Slide 1: A body text box set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: 2 body text boxes set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: A body text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: A text box set at 9 pt, too small to read
Slide 3: A body text box set at 11 pt, too small to read

Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable The median-wait comparison wraps awkwardly, leaving '9' alone on a line.Stat lines in the side panel wrap awkwardly: '9' is left alone on its own line and 'down / from 81%' breaks mid-phrase
Slide 3Download slide imagePolished Negative title ('is not mostly explained by') makes the point slower to grasp than a positive takeaway would
Slide 4Download slide imageAcceptable Both panels concentrate their content at the top and leave large empty lower areas, making the layout feel unfinished.Both cards leave roughly half their height empty, so space feels wasted
Slide 5Download slide imageAcceptable Both large panels have substantial unused space beneath relatively dense text blocks.Large empty space in the lower half of both cards