Muse Wonder: Responsive repairs: in-house team or renewed contract
For the board of trustees of a housing association, including two tenant board members. The decision it supports: whether to approve £1.2m to set up an in-house repairs team or renew the contract.
Verdict
Presentable
Deck rating
1,273
Slides
7 (brief: 6-9)
Design quality
71%
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2Polished
Slide 3AcceptableThe right-hand panel is text-heavy; understanding the adjustment requires reading several sentences.The right text panel is text-heavy, with the text packed at the top and the lower half of the panel left empty.
Slide 4AcceptableThe title names a topic rather than stating a takeaway.The title is a topic label ('What tenants are experiencing') rather than a takeaway such as 'complaints up 64%'.
Slide 5AcceptableThe title labels the topic rather than foregrounding the annual saving or payback takeaway.The '4.3' data label collides with the chart title 'Annual running cost (£m per year)'.
Slide 6AcceptableThe three cards are much taller than their content requires, leaving large empty lower sections and making the layout feel top-heavy.The three cards are mostly empty: the text fills only the top third and the lower two-thirds are wasted.
Slide 7PolishedThe central callout combines the bridging condition and cost comparison into one dense, uniformly bold paragraph.