For the board of directors (non-executives and the chief executive). The decision it supports: whether to approve £480k of capital for a Manchester store.
Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,273
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
67%
Why it is not presentable
Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
A slide the judges rated as needing work
In detail
Slide 1: A body text box set at 11 pt, too small to read
Slide 2: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 3: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 4: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 5: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 6: A text box set at 8 pt, too small to read
Slide 1Polished
Slide 2PolishedAll bars are the same navy, so the key comparison (business case assumption vs pop-up adjusted) is not highlighted
Slide 3Needs workThe bottom summary banner contains two missing-glyph boxes after the payback figures; replace these with supported symbols or text.The bottom callout shows missing-glyph boxes (tofu) after '42 months' and '30 months'; the intended tick/cross symbols do not render
Slide 4PolishedThe Leeds bar is not colour-highlighted even though it is the point of the slide
Slide 5AcceptableThe three oversized cards leave substantial unused space beneath their text, making the layout feel top-heavy.The title is a topic label rather than a takeaway
Slide 6AcceptableThe three decision items are packed into the upper portion, with a large empty gap before the bottom banner.The title is a topic label rather than a takeaway
