Benchmarks / DeckBench / Lumio

Measured by Spring Prompt

Particle-1: Starter churn: what to fund in Q1 2026

For the leadership team (chief executive, CFO, heads of product, sales and customer success). The decision it supports: whether to fund a Starter price cut or an onboarding programme in Q1 2026.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,163
Slides
7 (brief: 6-10)
Design quality
79%

Why it is not presentable

  • Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read
  • Quoted a figure the analysis says not to quote

In detail

  • Slide 7 quotes 104%: finance's unreconciled preliminary net revenue retention of 104%.
  • Slide 2: Text too faint against its background (contrast 2.4:1) (3 times)
  1. Slide 1 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 1Download slide imageAcceptable The title wraps with only 'cut' on the second line, creating an awkward, unbalanced headline.The title wraps and leaves the single word 'cut' alone on the second line; rebalance the line break or widen the text box.
  2. Slide 2 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable The three cards are text-heavy, with key figures embedded in bullets rather than visually emphasized.The text fills only the top half of each card, leaving the lower 40% or so of all three cards empty.
  3. Slide 3 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 3Download slide imagePolished
  4. Slide 4 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 4Download slide imagePolished
  5. Slide 5 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 5Download slide imagePolished The chart has no error bars or ranges, so the visible gap between the bars works against the 'within noise' message.
  6. Slide 6 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 6Download slide imagePolished
  7. Slide 7 of Particle-1's deck
    Slide 7Download slide imageAcceptable The bottom caveat is a dense, small-text paragraph spanning almost the full slide width, making it less easy to scan than the decision list.The caveat box is oversized; its text fills only the top third of the box.