Benchmarks / DeckBench / Pantry Lane

1. 
   Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
2. 
   Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable All table rows and values have equal visual emphasis; the CRM efficiency and search scale cited in the headline are not highlighted.The table is uniform: nothing highlights the CRM and paid search rows or the CAC and ROAS figures the title refers to, so the viewer has to hunt for the takeaway.
3. 
   Slide 3Download slide imagePolished
4. 
   Slide 4Download slide imageAcceptable The three cards rely on multi-line paragraphs, making the supporting rationale slower to scan.The body text is paragraph-heavy in each card, so the supporting metrics (2.48 ROAS, £40 CAC, £92 vs £171) are buried in prose rather than emphasised.
5. 
   Slide 5Download slide imageAcceptable The total row and the largest budget shifts have the same styling as every other table entry, weakening emphasis on the decision-driving numbers.The Change column has no colour or weight emphasis, so the key moves (Display −360, CRM +250, Search +180) don't stand out.