Benchmarks / DeckBench / Pantry Lane

Measured by Spring Prompt

Kimi K3: Paid media: H1 2026 allocation

For the CMO and the finance director. The decision it supports: how to allocate the £2.4m paid media budget for H1 2026.

Verdict
Not presentable
Deck rating
1,255
Slides
6 (brief: 5-8)
Design quality
83%

Why it is not presentable

  • Layout defect: something off the slide, colliding, too small or too faint to read

In detail

  • Slide 2: text 14: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 2: text 15: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 3: text 15: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 3: text 16: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 4: text 28: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 4: text 29: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 5: text 11: 9.5 pt text.
  • Slide 5: text 12: 9.5 pt text.
  1. Slide 1 of Kimi K3's deck
    Slide 1Polished The footer audience line on the right wraps awkwardly, leaving 'director' alone on a second line
  2. Slide 2 of Kimi K3's deck
    Slide 2Polished Bars are not sorted by value, so the spread takes longer to read
  3. Slide 3 of Kimi K3's deck
    Slide 3Polished
  4. Slide 4 of Kimi K3's deck
    Slide 4Polished Large gaps between the explanatory paragraphs and the bottom allocation lines make both panels feel vertically stretched.
  5. Slide 5 of Kimi K3's deck
    Slide 5Acceptable The left column ends high on the slide, leaving substantial unused space beneath it.Large empty area below the left-hand bullets
  6. Slide 6 of Kimi K3's deck
    Slide 6Acceptable The title identifies the proposal and total budget rather than highlighting the main allocation shift.Adjacent data labels crowd and nearly touch ('£540£560', '£300£320')