Benchmarks / DeckBench / Pantry Lane

1. 
   Slide 1Download slide imagePolished
2. 
   Slide 2Download slide imageAcceptable The headline emphasizes historical results, while the main recommendation appears below the KPI cards; the slide has two competing purposes.Bottom ~40% of the slide is empty, so the layout is top-heavy
3. 
   Slide 3Download slide imageAcceptable The table gives all values equal visual emphasis, making the strongest and weakest channels harder to identify quickly.Large empty gap between the table and the bullets disconnects the evidence from the commentary
4. 
   Slide 4Download slide imagePolished The two stat cards do not span the content width and leave an empty block on the right, misaligned with the full-width banner below
5. 
   Slide 5Download slide imageAcceptable The large yellow forecast warning competes with the title and makes a secondary caveat the strongest visual element.Both cards are roughly half empty at the bottom
6. 
   Slide 6Download slide imageAcceptable The major budget increases and reduction are not visually highlighted in the table.Large empty gap between the table and the bullets
7. 
   Slide 7Download slide imageAcceptable The approval request is repeated in the large opening statement and the yellow banner.The title is a topic label ('Recommendation') while the real message sits in a second, near-title-sized headline that competes with it